Skip to main content

Enjoying Retirement & Beyond

Enjoying Retirement & Beyond

Michael and Jennifer’s Case Study

How to Better Align Retirement Priorities With a Spouse or Partner

This case study illustrates a common planning situation faced by many families. The individuals described are hypothetical and do not represent actual clients. Outcomes are illustrative and are not a guarantee of future results.

Executive summary

Michael and Jennifer arrived with a financial question and a quieter one underneath it. The financial question was about Roth conversions and Social Security timing. The quieter one was that they had never really agreed on what retirement was for.

This case study covers both: the structured discovery that surfaced the disagreement, and the tax strategy that followed once priorities were settled.

Clarifying what matters most

We began, as we do with most couples, by having each spouse complete the Dangers, Opportunities, and Strengths exercise independently. Doing it separately matters — completed together, one person’s answers tend to shape the other’s.

“If we were having this discussion three years from today, and you were looking back to today, what would need to have happened for you to feel happy about your progress?”

The Success Vision question

What we discovered

Their answers diverged more than either expected. Michael’s centered on security and leaving a meaningful inheritance. Jennifer’s centered on time — specifically on travel while both were healthy enough to enjoy it.

Neither position was wrong, and neither had been stated plainly before. Much of the value of the exercise was simply getting both on the table in the same room.

Key strategy: the retirement tax window

The years between retiring and the start of required minimum distributions are frequently the lowest-bracket years of an entire lifetime. Earned income has stopped; required distributions have not yet begun; Social Security may not yet be claimed.

That window is finite and easy to waste. Filling the lower brackets with deliberate Roth conversions during those years reduces the size of future required distributions, lowers the tax on them, and leaves a more flexible asset for heirs.

We modeled a multi-year conversion schedule sized to bracket capacity each year, checked against Medicare premium thresholds, and coordinated with their Social Security claiming decision — which we modeled jointly rather than individually, since the survivor benefit outlasts both claiming choices.

Why the window closes

Once required distributions begin, they add to taxable income whether or not the money is needed — which can push conversions that were sensible at 65 into a bracket where they no longer make sense at 75.

Start the conversation

Schedule Your Conversation

Schedule a time to discuss whether our approach is the right fit for you.